|  This 
        essay was originally printed in the catalogue Ronald 
        Davis – Paintings published by the University Gallery, San Diego 
        State University, CA, and accompanied the Ronald Davis Floater Series 
        Exhibition held in 1980.
 
 
  The 
        apparent simplicity of Ron Davis' new "Floater" paintings conceals 
        a complicated set of spatial and pictorial decisions. These are challenging 
        paintings which require the viewer to build a perspectival and a physical 
        context for their imagery. We stand before a phenomenon composed of form 
        and color and shadow. It appears to be both flat and three-dimensional. 
        As it unfolds and as we probe it we discover a space built, as it were, 
        by our own need for continuity of experience, our desire to make optical 
        sense out of conflicting information.
  In 
        this new series Davis has removed the network of perspectival lines which 
        lent incident and excitement to his work of the past several years. The 
        lines have been erased but they linger as the conceptual basis of this 
        new work. Our perception of these floating forms and cast shadows depends 
        upon our own ability to discover and to reconstruct their underlying spatial 
        location. The picture plane appears to be flat but the shapes upon it 
        deny its flatness, force us to find a new configuration in order to support 
        their existence.
  Davis' 
        "floater" paintings also bring with them the aura of the magical, 
        they defy gravity and the normal logic of space. Floating forms generally 
        suggest suspension or levitation. In Davis' work, however, it does not 
        disturb us that forms are suspended on a brightly colored plane. They 
        serve to define space; we are perhaps more conscious of their placement, 
        the positions and angles they occupy, than we are of their physical relationships 
        to the ground plane.
  We 
        are also challenged to consider the factors of light and distance. As 
        the floating forms move upward in space they cast larger shadows by blocking 
        out more of their distant light source. In Davis' paintings we begin to 
        measure, intuitively of course, the distances between object and shadow. 
        We have little idea of the "real" size of the floating forms 
        but their affective scale, their impact upon the viewer, is of a solid, 
        substantial form in a grand space. This has always been true of his work. 
        Its scale exists in the mind and is measured intuitively. A small painting 
        may encompass a very large space indeed, even as a large canvas may appear 
        to be quite intimate as it brings the viewer closer and extends itself 
        into the real space of a room.
  Davis 
        has always dealt in visual paradoxes and impossibilities. Like Uccello, 
        Mantegna and Piranesi, he constructs his fictive world with an intellectual 
        and pictorial rigor more consistent and internally logical than that of 
        reality itself. In Davis' paintings we enter a world of clearly defined 
        forms created by the mind and unidentified by particularities or irregularities. 
        They move freely through time and space. He is, in many ways, a visionary 
        and visionaries frequently cause solid forms to be suspended in air, leaving 
        the spectator to stare into space with new excitement and wonder.
 — 
        Susan C. Larsen
  January
         4, 1980 
  Los
         Angeles, CA   |