This
essay was originally printed in the catalogue Ronald
Davis – Paintings published by the University Gallery, San Diego
State University, CA, and accompanied the Ronald Davis Floater Series
Exhibition held in 1980.
The
apparent simplicity of Ron Davis' new "Floater" paintings conceals
a complicated set of spatial and pictorial decisions. These are challenging
paintings which require the viewer to build a perspectival and a physical
context for their imagery. We stand before a phenomenon composed of form
and color and shadow. It appears to be both flat and three-dimensional.
As it unfolds and as we probe it we discover a space built, as it were,
by our own need for continuity of experience, our desire to make optical
sense out of conflicting information.
In
this new series Davis has removed the network of perspectival lines which
lent incident and excitement to his work of the past several years. The
lines have been erased but they linger as the conceptual basis of this
new work. Our perception of these floating forms and cast shadows depends
upon our own ability to discover and to reconstruct their underlying spatial
location. The picture plane appears to be flat but the shapes upon it
deny its flatness, force us to find a new configuration in order to support
their existence.
Davis'
"floater" paintings also bring with them the aura of the magical,
they defy gravity and the normal logic of space. Floating forms generally
suggest suspension or levitation. In Davis' work, however, it does not
disturb us that forms are suspended on a brightly colored plane. They
serve to define space; we are perhaps more conscious of their placement,
the positions and angles they occupy, than we are of their physical relationships
to the ground plane.
We
are also challenged to consider the factors of light and distance. As
the floating forms move upward in space they cast larger shadows by blocking
out more of their distant light source. In Davis' paintings we begin to
measure, intuitively of course, the distances between object and shadow.
We have little idea of the "real" size of the floating forms
but their affective scale, their impact upon the viewer, is of a solid,
substantial form in a grand space. This has always been true of his work.
Its scale exists in the mind and is measured intuitively. A small painting
may encompass a very large space indeed, even as a large canvas may appear
to be quite intimate as it brings the viewer closer and extends itself
into the real space of a room.
Davis
has always dealt in visual paradoxes and impossibilities. Like Uccello,
Mantegna and Piranesi, he constructs his fictive world with an intellectual
and pictorial rigor more consistent and internally logical than that of
reality itself. In Davis' paintings we enter a world of clearly defined
forms created by the mind and unidentified by particularities or irregularities.
They move freely through time and space. He is, in many ways, a visionary
and visionaries frequently cause solid forms to be suspended in air, leaving
the spectator to stare into space with new excitement and wonder.
—
Susan C. Larsen
January
4, 1980
Los
Angeles, CA
|