Nice.
Interesting getting the perspective on your pilgrim's progress.
Thanks for putting this stuff up. It's comforting to see these
campfires in the dark and think they're friends, no?
This
piece Micheletto da Cotignola Joins the Battle. Really spreads
it out all at once.
There
are these purely ornamental and nearly totally abstracted things
in this painting besides the running esquire wearing the mazzocchio.
I can't tell for sure, he might be holding one of the two similar
shields which are far left and slightly left of center
that have the outrageous geometric designs where Uchello shows
off a bit of handle he's gotten on the perspective staying up so
late at night with precise distortion over a planar surface.
Uccello
has taken these shields and their striking compass-rose geometry
and rotated the left one about 45° on its Y axis and
rotated and tipped the central one back on the X axis at the same
time which i think he did to show off. It's also striking
spatial device because they define an outward bowing arc inscribed
from the rear overhead that encloses the whole painting
it farthest outward extent is Cotignola's horse's front legs
actually i think the arc goes about through the withers
and is wrapped around in toward the backplane to the right by the
rumps of the hoses curving away from us.
He's
also stretched the hell out of that left horse so that it's about
as long as a VW bus, and used it to help kick Cotignola's horse
frontward almost through the picture plane in a difficult foreshortening
to get if you're going to preserve the mass of the beast. This
arc of device and flesh he's scribed pushes the left side way back,
the center forward but with a strangely cleared space to break
the plane horizontally and walk us in visually, and then wraps
back around to the right again. There really are elements of 3
point perspective here, in that he's working the apparent curvature
of the visual field of the human eye on a small scale so that it
seems wider to us.
The
guy can't leave it alone he really wanted to carve some
space here, and he mixed Gothic perceptual placement devices with
new techno metric perspective. Those matching striped bowling trophy
/ finial things above the armored horsemen's heads use several
methods - the lathe shaping and then leaning in toward the rear
center to point the eye. In case there was someone in the audience
that didn't get it, he used the old "lances leaning in and
back" gimmick too, along with a bit of the old "pennant
winding back through vertical pikes" business but i
think he's already so conversant here with the new idiom that he's
having us on a bit with the (ok, i'll say it..) "knowing juxtaposition
of the two visual technologies."
Finally
for me the cracker here is the bridget riley treatment of
the perfect sine waves of that flattened black and white striped
pennant. I mean, c'mon - this guy is good, he can paint a flag
like a flag if he wants to this is a purely ornamental statement
here that presages op-art and abstraction. Focus on the Unicorn
device if you like to wade in the shallows of "great man"
theory of history if it pleases, I mean there was
a patron involved, right? So? You work for Sony, you get the logo
in the picture, ok? But the shields, the stripey lathed looking
topknots, the sine wave banner that's Uchello running his
perspective machine - and playing with it on the sponsor's dime.
Sponsor probably didn't have a clue, y'know?
I'm
not saying here that this Uccello guy was some sort of prescient
trickster or something, knowingly anticipating art-future ("...tis
a poor history, that only works backwards...") and having
a giggle on us any more than Vermeer was anticipating the Kodak
Corporation or the opaque projector. But they were both thinking
in as consciously a modern and technological sense as anyone working
the medium in our time. You get to a certain level of awareness
here, and you get this non-time bound human intelligence effect
working through the long night.
/mark
robertson, 2001
|